Break Branches and Bending Grids
The sciences and the arts often use very different approaches to abstraction. In the sciences, for example, abstraction tends to be data driven: how can numbers show us something new about the world? In the arts, it is most famously thought of as the opposite: how can abstraction reveal expression? This divide persists in many people’s perception of the two fields: art is expressive and science is analytic. But I think of a camera as a machine that both measures and expresses. And I think of art and science as compliments.
Grids and branches represent two very different systems for interpreting and reproducing the world. They’re the underlying data of today’s image files: pixels or vectors. Both systems are incredibly useful, and which to use depends on context. Vectors are horrible at carrying photographic information. Grids (or the crystalline structure of film grain) are essential to it, but that information breaks down when magnified. But using the various systems we’ve developed to see the world together, we can find new insights and surprising images. Moiré can result in the positive and negative reinforcement of different sized grids. Branches start to entwine as vines grow together, creating knots that seem impossible to untie. Other times, these layers show the cracks in each system.
I often find one things breaks, something new begins to present itself. And I find new ideas that are hidden in the world. In ecology, for example, loose trends often leave us with scatter, and only through complicated mathematics can we map these vague trends at the abstract and penumbral edges of the world. By breaking these systems and trying to put them back together in unusual ways, I try to glimpse at the imperfect, unusual, and broken edges that are created: the remaining wildernesses.